The USPTO has developed a system to administer continuing legal education to practitioners. This system, entitled the “Continuing Education for Practitioners” or (“CEP”) system, is intended to “increase efficiency, reduce pendency, and improve quality in the patent process.” The USPTO states that the CEP system is “built on the recognition that a smoothly operating patent…
Month: August 2008
A Few Reasons To Consider Including A Listing Of Claims In Every Response To An Office Action
Listings of claims are required in most, but not all responses to Office actions. This post discusses when they are required and why it may be prudent to include them even when they are not. The Rules The manner of making amendments in a patent application is governed by 37 CFR. 1.121 entitled “Manner of…
Interesting Editorial On The Subject Of Patent Reform In This Presidential Election
Yesterday the patent blog Patently-O had an interesting guest editorial on the subject of the presidential candidates’ respective positions (or absence thereof) on U.S. patent reform. The gist of this editorial is that Sen. Obama has and will continue to take patent issues “seriously” while Sen. McCain has avoided this important subject for political expediency….