<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Comments On And Practical Suggestions For Improved After Final Practice</title>
	<atom:link href="http://patentablydefined.com/2007/09/04/comments-on-and-practical-suggestions-for-improved-after-final-practice/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://patentablydefined.com/2007/09/04/comments-on-and-practical-suggestions-for-improved-after-final-practice/</link>
	<description>A practical patent prosecution blog published by Michael Kondoudis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:32:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Kramer</title>
		<link>http://patentablydefined.com/2007/09/04/comments-on-and-practical-suggestions-for-improved-after-final-practice/comment-page-1/#comment-4927</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Kramer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 18:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patentablydefined.com/?p=25#comment-4927</guid>
		<description>Excellent comments.  

BTW, I recently received a rejection where the examiner stated that an advantage of the instant invention was not stated in the specification.  However, the specification can be amended to recite the advantage without adding new matter.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent comments.  </p>
<p>BTW, I recently received a rejection where the examiner stated that an advantage of the instant invention was not stated in the specification.  However, the specification can be amended to recite the advantage without adding new matter.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

