Comments on: Prosecution Profanity – Words To Avoid In Prosecution – Part 2 http://patentablydefined.com/2007/06/05/prosecution-profanity-words-to-avoid-in-prosecution-part-2/ A practical patent prosecution blog published by Michael Kondoudis Wed, 25 Jan 2012 17:32:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: Zvika Ben-Ari http://patentablydefined.com/2007/06/05/prosecution-profanity-words-to-avoid-in-prosecution-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-4723 Zvika Ben-Ari Thu, 16 Oct 2008 09:32:30 +0000 http://patentablydefined.com/?p=17#comment-4723 <p>Apparently you, C. bergere and I had similarly astute mentor's. BTW, since the Office or O.A. is inanimate, when avoiding using the term "Examiner", I write something like "the objection raised in the O.A. ..."; or "it is opined in the O.A. that ..."<br /> </p> Apparently you, C. bergere and I had similarly astute mentor’s. BTW, since the Office or O.A. is inanimate, when avoiding using the term “Examiner”, I write something like “the objection raised in the O.A. …”; or “it is opined in the O.A. that …”

]]> By: c. bergere http://patentablydefined.com/2007/06/05/prosecution-profanity-words-to-avoid-in-prosecution-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-20 c. bergere Thu, 28 Jun 2007 06:43:21 +0000 http://patentablydefined.com/?p=17#comment-20 Sounds like we had the same mentors! I was taught that my clients' inventions have features and everyone elses have limitations. Sounds like we had the same mentors!

I was taught that my clients’ inventions have features and everyone elses have limitations.

]]>